If meetings are widely considered a waste of time, that’s because, well, they can be a waste of time. Paul Godin, a mediator with Stitt Feld Handy Group in Toronto, says that too often meetings have no clear purpose, plan or outcome. “People are happy to talk about what’s wrong, what could be done, what should be done, but without ever committing themselves to a plan of action moving forward. Meetings can be hijacked by verbal chaos that makes people feel like pulling their hair out.”
Jeff Gibson is vice-president of consulting for the Table Group, a California-based company. He’s heard more than his fair share of hyperbolic statements about workplace meetings. “People often say to us that they’d really love their job if they didn’t have to go to meetings and manage people, which is really a little tragic. If you think about it, at a certain point in your career, what else do you do?” Continue reading this entry »
Radek Cecha :: About Author :: EmailChanges at the Ontario Human Rights Commission
As you may know, the Ontario Human Rights Commission is one of the many government bodies that offers mediation as process to help resolve the complaints that it receives. You may have also heard that there are going to be some changes to the way that the Ontario Human Rights Commission handles complaints. I was curious about the reforms and was able to dig up the following summary of the changes from the Ministry of the Attorney General’s website. Please click on the link below for more information. Continue reading this entry »
Nigel Hudson :: About Author :: EmailADR Training Concludes
The Ethiopian Herald (National Section)
Friday February 29, 2008
Page 9
Addis Ababa – A 10-day training attended by officials of the Ethiopian Institution for the Ombudsman on Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) wound up at Ghion Hotel here yesterday.
After handing outs certificates to the trainees, Institution Chief Ombudsman with the Rank of Minister, Abay Tekle said that the training is so helpful to offer negotiation, mediation, and arbitration services for parties who would want to avoid courses of litigation which is cumbersome and costs much. He further said the members of the Institution would be able to conduct the ADR mechanisms effectively and efficiently in discharging their responsibilities.
The training was organized by the Ethiopian Arbitration and Conciliation Centre and Stitt Feld Handy Group.
Nigel Hudson :: About Author :: EmailHow can I deliver tough messages in performance reviews and not alienate my staff?
We’ve all heard them: “I’m sorry to tell you this, and don’t worry, but . . . ”. Or, “I’m sure you’ll look back on this and think it was the best thing that ever happened.” I’m sure this kind of comment didn’t sound or feel true to you, whether you heard it or felt compelled to say it. In these types of situations–dismissals, performance problems, re-organizations, etc., the challenge is to deliver the message while maintaining the best possible relationship. Here are some ideas about making this two-pronged task easier.
Frank Handy :: About Author :: EmailArbitrator’s Ruling Went Beyond the Scope of the Arbitration Agreement
Smyth v. Medical Advisory Committee of the Perth
2007 CanLII 46718 (ON S.C.) – November 2, 2007
Arbitration ruling (the “Ruling) – The parties agreed to have the issues pertaining to the Medical Advisory Committee’s denial of Dr. Smyth’s request for hospital privileges dealt with by way of binding and confidential arbitration – The Arbitrator’s Ruling supported the denial of his reappointment to the medical staff at Falls District Hospital – Dr. Smyth applied to have the Ruling set aside, arguing that the Arbitrator dealt with issues that went beyond the scope of the Arbitration Agreement – He submitted that the issues to be dealt with at the Arbitration were intended to be two narrow issues that were specifically reiterated in the Arbitration Agreement – The Respondents argued that the what was put before the arbitrator was the appropriateness of the Medical Advisory Committee’s recommendation and the broader issue of the disposition of Dr. Smyth’s application for reappointment – The Court disagreed with the Respondent’s position and found that the only two issues that were to be dealt with at the arbitration hearing were the two issues specifically reiterated in the Arbitration Agreement – Had the parties intended the scope of the Arbitration Agreement to include additional matters, specific wording, such as a basket clause, would have been included in it – The Ruling made by the Arbitrator clearly dealt with matters beyond the scope of the two specific issues set out in the Arbitration Agreement – The Ruling was set aside and a new Arbitration hearing on the two specific issues was ordered – Dr. Smyth was granted full hospital privileges pending the completion of the new arbitration hearing.
http://www.canlii.org/en/on/onsc/doc/2007/2007canlii46718/2007canlii46718.html
Nigel Hudson :: About Author :: EmailRecent Cases in ADR
Condominium Corporation Failed to Follow Mandatory Mediation and Arbitration Provisions
Metropolitan Condominium Corporation No. 1143 v. Peng
2008 CanLII 1951 (ON S.C.) – January 25, 2008
Condominium Act (the “Act”) – Mandatory mediation and arbitration provisions – MTCC 1143 (the “Corporation”) alleged that Li Peng (a unit owner) conducted himself in a loud and disturbing manner, contrary to the Corporation’s Rules – Li submitted that he did not behave in an inappropriate manner that would have disturbed his neighbours – From May 2005 to January 2007, the Corporation sent Li eight letters complaining about his conduct, without response from Li – Continue reading this entry »
Noteworthy Cases in ADR
NOTEWORTHY CASES
Supreme Court of Canada Rules on Arbitration Clauses in Web-based Contracts
Dell Computer Corp. v. Union des Consommateurs
2007 SCC 34 - July 13, 2007
Web-based contract - Arbitration clause - Dell’s website had an error in pricing on it for 2 types of handheld computers - When Dell became aware of the errors, it blocked access to the order pages through it’s main website and posted a correction notice - However, a consumer (O. Dumoulin) was able to get into the page through a different route and ordered a handheld at the lower price - When Dell refused to honour Dumoulin’s order at the lower price, the Consumer Union and Dumoulin filed a motion to bring a class action against Dell - Dell applied for referral of Dumoulin’s claim to arbitration Continue reading this entry »
Nigel Hudson :: About Author :: EmailPoem by a Participant in Trinidad’s Advanced ADR Workshop (Oct. 2-5, 2007)
A Dedication Part 2 to Peter Dreyer & Nayla Mitha
By Tonia Robinson - Oct. 5, 2007
It’s even better to feel great!
But when you meet two people who are
Exceptional at doing both
Emotions Are Contagious
As a Sociology Major, I am always intrigued by the functional reasons underlying people’s behaviour. I found these quotes from Daniel Goleman’s book, Working With Emotional Intelligence particularly interesting:
Continue reading this entry »
Arbitration Clauses in Web-based Contracts
DELL COMPUTER CORP. V. UNION DES CONSOMMATEURS
2007 SCC 34 - JULY 13, 2007
The Supreme Court of Canada recently released a decision that originated from a case based in Quebec. A number of organizations were granted intervener status, including ADR Chambers and the ADR Institute of Canada.
Continue reading this entry »
Feedback for Success
Feedback is something that we all have to give and receive at different times in our lives. Daniel Goleman says the following about feedback in his book, Working with Emotional Intelligence (Bantam Books: New York, 2006):
Nigel Hudson :: About Author :: EmailPoem from a Trinidad Participant
I recently had the pleasure of delivering our ADR Workshop in Trinidad with Peter Dreyer. At the end of the workshop, one of the participants recited the following poem to us… Continue reading this entry »
Nigel Hudson :: About Author :: EmailTips for Running Meetings from Tongue Fu! by Sam Horn
Here are some interesting tips for running a meeting from Sam Horn’s book Tongue Fu!
(1) One person speak at a time
We’ve all heard this one before, but what was new for me, was the suggested method of enforcement: Look at the original speaker and say “Excuse me (name of speaker), let’s wait until we have everyone’s attention”. Do not look at the interrupter, so as not to embarass him or her. If the interrupter continues talking, repeat your call to order. Only after everyone is silent give the floor back to the original speaker. Continue reading this entry »
Nigel Hudson :: About Author :: EmailCopyright 2007 Stitt Feld Handy Group.